Monday , October 19 2020
Home / Texas DUI News / COVID-19, Violent Offender Release

COVID-19, Violent Offender Release

The News reports that jails are releasing inmates due to COVID-19.  Is this true?

 

Yes. It has been reported and confirmed that inmates in Harris County, Dallas County, some Texas prisons and a juvenile detention center have COVID-19.  This is a problem due to increased community spread in the jail environment; which outside of putting inmates’ health in danger, endangers the lives of the jail and prison staff and adds more pressure to the hospital community.

 

Are jails and prisons releasing inmates due to COVID-19?

 

Yes. This is not a blanket wide release of everyone in jail or prison. Each state, jurisdiction (federal or state), and county is making their own guidelines on release.  75% of all inmates in Texas county jails are awaiting their case resolutions.

 

What about the release of violent offenders?

 

Governor Abbot issued executive order GA 13 which forbids the release of anyone who has been convicted of a violent offense or is charged with one. This does not mean that they cannot bond out. This simply means that they will not have the benefit of getting out at no cost as a result of COVID-19, as some will be.

 

What does the early release of inmates legally mean?

 

The provisions of law regarding habeas corpus under Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, chapter 11 will not apply to inmates who have violent offense convictions or are charged with one. The safeguards against being held without a charge under Article 17.151 (being released on personal bond or a reduced bond at 90 days) do not apply to “violent offenders” (see above, past convictions for violent offenses or present charges of such). The time has been tolled under the Governor’s order due to covid-19.  Everyone being released will have to face their charges and sentences, if applicable, at a later date.

 

What legal authority does the Governor have to keep “violent offenders” (see above definition) in jail without the benefit of COVID-19 huminatarian releases?

 

The executive order outlines his authority:

 

WHEREAS, the “governor is responsible for meeting … the dangers to the state and people presented by disasters” under Section 418.011 of the Texas Government Code, and the legislature has given the governor broad authority to fulfill that responsibility; and

 

WHEREAS, under Section 418.012, the “governor may issue executive orders hav[ingJ the force and effect of law;” and

 

WHEREAS, under Section 418.016(a), in addition to the other powers given, the “governor may suspend the provisions of any regulatory statute prescribing the procedures for conduct of state business …if strict compliance with the provisions would in any way prevent, hinder, or delay necessary action in coping with a disaster;” and

 

WHEREAS, under Section 418.017(a), the “governor may use all available resources of state government and of political subdivisions that are reasonably necessary to cope with a disaster;”

 

The laws of Texas give the Governor. great authority to issue executive orders, particularly in times of “imminent threat of disaster.” The Commissioner of the Texas Department of State Health Services has determined that COVID-19 to be a public health disaster within the meaning of Chapter 81 of the Texas Health and Safety Code. In issuing his executive orders, the Governor has certified such under Section 418.014 of the Texas Government Code.

 

What is the practical effect of the Governor’s COVID-19 order?

 

Of course, there are some legal entities who have announced they will disregard the Governor’s orders and some lawyer groups are threatening to take action.  It is important to remember the lessons of history. The most famous American habeas corpus case involved John Merryman. As the country was dividing over the issue of slavery, John Merryman and a large group of rioters burned railroad bridges and cut telegraph wires to prevent Union troops from reaching the Capitol. Officials arrested Merryman. Supreme Court Justice Roger B Tany, riding circuit court, granted a writ of habeas corpus to secure Merryman’s release. President Abraham Lincoln ignored it.

The U.S. Constitution provides in Article 1, section 9, “The privilege of the writ of habeas corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in cases of rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it.” Lincoln declared that the suspension of writs was more to prevent harmful behavior to the country than punish an individual. Eventually, President Lincoln granted universal amnesty in an effort to unite the country. John Merryman was never prosecuted.  It would be wise to remember that these are not normal times. The Governor has not abolished bail for those accused of violent offenses, he has just deprived them of the unusual mechanisms being deployed now to empty the jails to prevent catastrophic COVID-19 spread and consequences.

 

On the topic of Violence during these trying times…

 

We all know that violence is unacceptable. We also all know that stress can produce unhealthy behaviors. As many are losing their jobs, unable to pay rent and mortgages, worrying about their next meal, please remember to practice great patience and forbearance. Practice the 24 hour rule; hold your breath and promise that you will think about your response for 24 hours before saying or doing anything. You will find a good night’s rest will help you see clearer and make better decisions. Focus on the big picture, and know that you are not in it alone. We are all in this together with you. This will be over.  Remember that what is important is WHO you are now, so watch carefully what you do. Do not react selfishly.

This COVID-19 crisis is not the time for employers to furlough or lay off people. Take care of those who take care of you. See the long-term picture. Find a way to take care of those around you. The government’s stimulus package can help. There will always be time to recoup on savings, retirement and pay back loans. There may not ever be another time where to prove to your loved ones, and those for whom you are obligated, that they are more important than you.  We are what we do, not what we have. Take a breath and in the meantime, focus on what Mr. Fred Rogers said, “Look for the helpers, you will always find people who are helping.” Be one of those helpers.

 

Stay safe —

Mimi Coffey – DWI Defense Lawyer in Dallas County, DWI Lawyer in Tarrant County, DWI Lawyer in Wise County, DWI Lawyer in Johnson County, DWI Lawyer in Parker County, DWI Lawyer in Collin County, DWI Lawyer in Denton County

Helpful advice during COVID-19

**** GOVERNOR ABBOTT RECOMMENDS THAT COURTS NOT ALLOW IN-PERSON APPEARANCES UNTIL AT LEAST JUNE 1 (as of April 27, 2020) ****

About Mimi Coffey

Mimi Coffey
Mimi Coffey is a trial attorney with 24 years experience. She is the founder of The Coffey Firm, serving Dallas, Tarrant and Collin counties. She is board-certified in DWI by the National College of DUI Defense (NCDD) and is a Regent of the NCDD. Mimi Coffey also listed on several “top” directory listings such as DWI attorneys Tarrant County, DWI Lawyer Fort Worth, DWI attorney Dallas County, DWI attorneys Collin County and DWI attorneys Parker County. I am very involved with the community DFW caring DWI lawyer, Texas Tech School of Law foundation and I enjoy using the skills I have developed to give back to the community. She has also appeared numerous times as a legal commentator for CNN, National Fox News, as well as local Dallas/Fort Worth stations on DWI-related stories. She is also a frequent speaker at both national and statewide seminars. She is a prolific trial attorney with a proven trial record. She has tried over 300 cases, with 80% of them being jury trials in her 18-year career. Her success includes everything from .21 breath tests, blood tests to 3 car accident cases just to name a few. Mimi’s cases have also made good case law for the State of Texas. For example, in Tarvin v. State, it was found that weaving within your own lane was not a traffic violation. In Lajoie v. State, the courts determined that the defendant’s request to have his attorney must be suppressed as opposed to used as evidence of guilt. She is the author of Texas DWI Defense: The Law and Practice. She is also the author of three nationally-published articles and four statewide articles. Mimi has twice attended Indiana University’s Borkenstein Course for state toxicologists both on alcohol and drugs. She has also completed the NHTSA SFST Course, SFST Instructor Course and the 12-Step DRE Mini-Course Program. She is also one of the first attorneys in the United States to attend the Axion Labs Gas Chromatography Training. Her minor in college was Geology lending her a comprehensive and disciplined scientific mind when it comes to scientific and mathematical issues such as blood and breath testing. Mimi has won the President’s Heart of a Champion Award presented by the Texas Criminal Defense Lawyers Association (TCDLA) numerous times. Mimi also led the effort to get the State Bar of Texas’ Board of Legal Specialization to recognize the NCDD’s DWI Certification. Mimi has been active in 4 legislative sessions in fighting against bad DWI laws. Her efforts prevented the breath/blood test refusal as being a separate crime. She has advocated for true deferred adjudication for DWI. Mimi also sued a Dalworthington Gardens police officer for illegally drawing blood. Since her lawsuit, the 2nd Court of Appeals ruled against police officers drawing blood. (The Court of Criminal Appeals overturned this). Mimi also sued the Texas Department of Public Safety for its double jeopardy surcharge program. Since the initiation of her suit, Texas DPS has instituted amnesty programs based on one’s earning potential.

If you would like to contact the author, please visit: https://www.mimicoffey.com


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*